Is proof overrated? October Wheeler Centre debate

T

he concept of scientific proof is an important one in a rational society, but what does ‘proof’ really mean and how does it inform public policy in practice?

Policy-makers often cite research as proof on contested issues. But whether or not overwhelming evidence necessarily leads to evidence-based policy is another question. Is proof overrated? How does Australian society use research to inform its decisions?

'Is Proof Overrated?' is being staged in partnership with the Wheeler Centre and University of Melbourne Research Institutes, and explores how proof is used by society to make decisions and the role that research plays in informing public policy in practice.

The panellists are Professor Peter Doherty, Associate Professor Megan Munsie, Dr Ranjana Srivastava, Professor Kate Auty, and Dr Sara Bice, who between them have a wealth of experience in both policy-making and research.

They and host Sally Warhaft will have a spirited debate about the role of research in the choices we make about everything from energy technologies, social equity, and environmental policies to our use of medical breakthroughs and new communication technologies.