by Robert McLean
Exploring the realities of climate change is difficult to do
without “scaring the horses”.
Addressing climate change psychologically is unquestionably going
to be more difficult for most of us than making the unavoidable physical
changes, making it nearly impossible to not "scare the horses".
![]() |
| Stephen Emmott's book, "10 Billion". |
The impacts of climate change will be physically felt mostly,
and initially, by those in the less developed parts of the world, but oddly,
and because of their existing circumstances, they will be best placed to deal
psychologically with the unfolding changes.
The causes of climate change can be attributed to many things,
but one undeniable factor is the exploding human population growth on earth and
already our numbers exceed seven billion.
Earth’s human numbers have tripled in my lifetime from more
than two billion in 1947 to a number just beyond seven billion today and if
growth continues on its present trajectory and nothing intervenes, then there
will be nearly 20 billion people sharing the planet by the end of the century.
For understandable practical reasons that is an obvious impossibility
and those who have considered and studied earth’s carry capacity, considering
our existing behaviours, put the upper limit at about half (3.5 billion) of what
exists.
The head of Computational Science at Microsoft Research in
Cambridge, UK, Stephen J. Emmott, who is also a visiting professor at the
University College London and the University of Oxford, has written about and
put considerable thought into population and written about it in his 2013 book,
“10 Billion”.
Discussing the difficulties associated with the broad
acknowledgement of and acceptance of climate change, Prof Emmott wrote: “It
used to be a case of, ‘ we need to wait for science to prove climate change is
happening’. This is now beyond doubt”, he wrote.
![]() |
| Earth's present population trajectory simply means 'trouble'. |
Then he added: “So now it’s, ‘we need for scientists to be
able to tell what the impact will be and the costs’. And, ‘we need to wait for
public opinion to get behind action,” he said.
Pointing to what he described as “token gestures” such as
switching off mobile phone chargers, weeing the shower (his favourite), buying
and electric car (no don’t, he says) and using two sheets of loo paper instead
of three, Prof Emmott said on “10 Billion” that these things “miss the fundamental
fact that the scale and nature of the problems we face are immense,
unprecedented and possibly unsolvable”.
He said: “We urgently need to do – and I actually mean do –
something radical to avert a global catastrophe. But I don’t think we will.
“I think we are fucked,” he wrote.


No comments:
Post a Comment