by Robert McLean
Hitherto
unimagined and unforeseen difficulties demand an equally dramatic,
innovative and imaginative response.
Climate change has become even more vigorous, more vivid and has maybe reached a measurable tipping point taking the world, and particularly humanity into unexplored territory.
![]() |
| The ultimate outcome of war - death and destruction. An inevitable result of climate change unless the people can again take control of the levers of social change. |
From here on in, it is like we are speeding down a busy
highway, blindfolded with little more than hope to ensure we avoid crashing.
So continuing with “business as usual” was have realised the
fears of many scientists, including those of Nobel Laureate Peter Doherty, who
wrote four years ago about his concerns
that we would be forced into a “fire engine” mode to counter some major, and
perhaps irreversible global disaster.
Well, all the numbers suggest
that the feared “fire engine” mode, that need for a global and sweeping
response to our inattention and willful ignorance, or is it “rational
ignorance?”, has arrived.
Two questions immediately come into focus – what and how?
The first question is probably not the most critical as it
revolves around our energy use and consumptive habits, but the second question of
how we go about changing those behaviours, holding on to what we enjoy about
modernity and along with that preserving our civility and decency is probably
the most complex and perplexing of the dilemmas.
More than a decade ago, Richard Heinberg wrote about the
party being over and although his book, “The Party's Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies” now populates the remainder
tables, it was rather prescient.
So how do we wean humanity off gift-rich, party-like
atmosphere of the fossil fuel era without a
collapse in social disarray?
Unsure, but it will take hitherto
unseen leadership embedded in a charisma and with an urgency that swept the
world as it gathered resources in the late 1930s in preparation for what was to
become World War Two.
It is a sad but necessary comparison
for war is about destruction and our attempts to mitigate and adapt to climate
change are quite the reverse for this is about the bonding of humanity, it is
about having a common goal, it is about the realization that unless we work
together, collaborate and share our resources then as Heinberg said early this
century, “the party’s over”.
Sadly, those who have profited most from this uninhibited
fossil-fuelled party have control of society’s
levers of change and until they either surrender that control (unlikely) or
conditions on earth become such that they lose control, then we are destined
for damnable difficult times.
Time is remarkably short,
there is a pressing urgency about addressing the advance of climate change and
I have no resort other than optimism – the hope that what I sense is a growing
movement among people that will demand, irresistibly, that the “business-as-usual
brigade” change its behaviour and put the welfare of the planet ahead of
profit.
I hope that happens and I
hope that happens quickly for we are now deep in what has been described by
many as the “critical decade”.

No comments:
Post a Comment