Climate debate stumbles when it becomes politicized

-      by Katherine Hayhoe

A world map illustrating climate vulnerability.

New to Texas Tech, it was my first year as an atmospheric science professor. We’d just moved to Lubbock, the second most conservative town in the United States. A colleague asked me to guest teach his undergraduate geology course while he was out of town.

The packed lecture hall was cavernous and dark. Many of the students were glued to their phones; others were slumped over, dozing. I began with the fundamental components of the climate system; I waded through the geologic climate record and ice core data; and finally, I explained natural cycles and the role of carbon dioxide—both natural and human-produced—in controlling Earth’s climate.

I ended my lecture, as many professors do, with a hopeful invitation for any questions. One hand immediately shot up.

Someone had been listening—and cared enough to ask a question! I thought.

The first student stood up. I looked encouraging. He cleared his throat. And then, in a loud and belligerent tone, he stated:

“You’re a Democrat, aren’t you?”

That was my baptism by fire into what has now become a fact of life across the entire country

Read the Prairie Fire story - “Climate, Politics, and Religion.”

The time for debating climate change is long gone

T

he time for debating climate change is long gone.

Professor Katharine Hayhoe.

Instead of procrastinating and prevaricating about the science, we should be enthusiastically discussing workable abatement and how we can live with the evolving changes global warming will bring to earth’s climate system and so weather.

Utopia rarely arrives without a discordant note somewhere and so many still have to go to the public with convincing arguments about what is holding us back and why.

One who beats the drum on behalf of her fellow climate scientists is atmospheric scientist from the Texas Tech University, Professor Katharine Hayhoe, seen here on TEDx asking the question, “What if climate change is real?”