Showing posts with label rules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rules. Show all posts

15 December, 2018

Scientists called for ‘unprecedented’ action. But the global climate talks aren’t built for that

KATOWICE, Poland — Negotiators from nearly 200 nations drew close to a deal Friday that would nudge the world toward stronger targets for reducing carbon emissions and enshrine a clearer set of rules for how to get there.
A group of Polish youths staged a protest in the U.N.
climate conference venue in Katowice on the last
scheduled day of talks to urge negotiators from
almost 200 countries to reach an agreement on ways
of keeping global warming in check.
But even amid the glimmers of progress at this year’s climate summit, where more than 25,000 people have gathered in the heart of Poland’s coal mining region, there was a deeper undercurrent of dismay. The world’s best efforts, some participants concluded after two weeks of nonstop talks, would not nearly match the urgency of a problem that scientists have said will bring catastrophic consequences without major action over the next 12 years.

“Climate change is not something in our future. It’s happening to us now,” said Mohamed Nasheed, former president of the Maldives and chief of the island nation’s negotiating team here. “We will not survive if business goes as usual.”


Read the story from The Washington Post by Griff Witte and Brady Dennis - “Scientists called for ‘unprecedented’ action. But the global climate talks aren’t built for that.”

12 September, 2013

Folk wisdom and religion may lead us out of trouble


It was once argued that we have “stone age emotions, medieval institutions and god-like technology” and the continued allowance of a behaviour that allows climate change to expand unabated confirms that.

B.F. Skinner was
prescient in his
thinking.
Beyond that fundamental inadequacy, human intelligence is questionable for we know broadly where we are going, but we are unable to change our behaviours with sufficient haste to slow, or stop, the damage we are causing to earth’s atmosphere.

Unbridle climate change has the capacity to end human life on earth, well in not end humanity’s reign at the top of the food chain, reduce it to a few cowering pockets of humanity eking our life in a precarious way, putting mankind among earth’s threatened species.

Writing in his 1971 book “Beyond Freedom and Dignity”, the late American psychologist, behaviourist, inventor and social philosopher, B.F Skinner, discussed our inability to position human understanding and technology in our lives.

He wrote that where human behaviour begins, technology stops and that we must carry on as we have in the past, with what we have learned from personal experience, or from those collections of personal experiences called “history”, or with the distillations of experience to be found in folk wisdom or practical rules of thumb.

“These have been available for centuries, and all we have to show for them it the state of the world today,” he wrote.

Skinner wrote that 2500 years ago it might have been said that man understood himself as well as any other part of his world, but “Today”, he wrote, “he is the thing he understands least.”

He was writing long before science understood the existence and causes of climate change, but his was prescient understanding why it is a dilemma to which we are unequal.

Skinner, who died in 1990, would have been dismayed (in truth probably not) that we continue to discount the importance of the environment, sacrificing it without apparent care or concern to ensure short-term gains are realised with little or no concern for or about our intergenerational responsibilities.

Religious practices may or may not appeal to you, but within them is a behaviour that could rescue humanity from itself.

Author John S. Schumacher, writing in “The Age of Insanity: Modernity and Mental Health”, encouraged his readers to consider the life of the Amish people whose lives are simple and yet loaded with rich tradition; tradition s that are contrary “to a worrying consensus of stupidity that is contributing to a number of contemporary and emotional ills”.

Emile Durkheim.
It was the late Emile Durkheim who said that Western culture had become a disorganized dust of individuals who have been freed from all genuine social bonds.

Should we fail to acknowledge and do something about climate change, then dust we will be.

In the midst of human behavioural dilemmas (read failures) we read in a story published in the Guardian headed: “Astronomer royal calls for ‘Plan B’ to stop runaway climate change”.

Lord Rees has appealed for research into geo-engineering technologies in case efforts to curb carbon emissions fail and considering the result of the September 7 Federal Elections in Australia that saw the election of a conservative government that about to cut a swathe through the country’s environmental controls, giving runaway climate change a leg-up.

Geo-engineering is loaded with risk and through unintended consequences could bring more trouble upon us, than climate change itself.

However, should whatever is implemented work, then it does naught except allow us to continue to plunder the earth’s resources and through that ensure the sustenance of a world structure that favours just a few and disadvantages billions.