The climate change
conversation is complex in the extreme, but is little more than a friendly
neighbourhood chat compared to the emotion-charged discussion about nuclear
power.
![]() |
| Federal Resources Minister, Gary Gray, he wants a national discussion about nuclear power. |
Discussion devoid of logic and driven by argument pining for
fact herds reason into a cul-de-sac leaving the nuclear power advocates on an
isthmus that a flood a disapproval is about to cut loose from the mainland.
Traditional power sources, primarily coal, are clearly
responsible for many thousands of deaths, maybe even millions, while deaths
nuclear power faults on a comparative basis, relatively few.
The discovery of coal and the subsequent realization that it’s
energy could be accessed by humans and used for many purposes freeing them from
a paradigm in which the prime sources of energy were sun, wind, water, human
and animal to open a new vista in which fossil-fuel energy freed them from
their daily drudgeries and without those natural limitations, humans
flourished.
As with everything, however, there are unintended consequences
and so after more than two centuries of gouging on reserves nature had put
aside, the party, to use Richard Heinberg’s words, is over for we have damaged
the climate (at least in human terms) to such an extent, that the only exist
open to us is a return to sun, wind, water, human and animal power.
There is, however, still another fossil energy that humanity
has until now only, in the greater scheme of things, really simply fiddled
with. That is a suggestion that the French would unquestionably take umbrage
with for some seventy per cent of their power come from this source.
Uranium, an energy-rich fossil fuel, allows for nuclear power
and being effectively free of carbon-dioxide emissions, it stands as a genuine
alternative to meet the world’s energy needs and when considered in isolation it
would be a major step in mitigating global warming.
Federal Government Resources Minister, Gary Gray, wants
Australian’s to objectively and honestly discuss and although he didn’t say so
much, such a discussion would only produce an effective result if each of us
were able to enter it in a non-ideological manner.
Mr Gray talked about the need for a national discussion
about nuclear power at the recent Australian Uranium and Rare Earths conference
in Perth.
The ABC report on the
matter in a story headed: “Federal Resources Minister Gary Gray wants nuclear Australia debate”.

No comments:
Post a Comment