![]() |
| The pen is mightier than the sword and used with enthusiasm it can help mitigate climate change. |
Letter writing might seem inadequate in the face of the overwhelmingly
power of the forces that are leading the world down the path of climate change,
but that is not true.
The “Letters” section of newspapers is one of the most avidly read sections with the content being devoured by people from all walks of life – from casual readers to decision makers and from caring, sensitive believers of the global warming science through to the rather sad skeptics and doubters.
The “Letters” section of newspapers is one of the most avidly read sections with the content being devoured by people from all walks of life – from casual readers to decision makers and from caring, sensitive believers of the global warming science through to the rather sad skeptics and doubters.
Enthusiastic Beneath the Wisteria supporter, John Pettigrew, is one who understands the value and importance of letter writing and below is a copy of his latest letter to the Shepparton News.
Well done John!
Lack
of conviction.
To achieve their 2020 target of a 5%
reduction in carbon emissions the Coalition would need to spend an extra $4
billion. The current Coalition policy and funding estimates do not reduce
Australia’s carbon pollution, but would result in a rise by 8 to 10 per cent
above 2000 levels by 2020.
These are the latest findings of a
study and detailed modelling undertaken by
SKM–MMA and Monash University’s Centre of Policy Studies that was commissioned
by internationally recognised The Climate Institute.
This latest study casts serious
doubts over the effectiveness of the coalition’s “Direct Action” policy despite
stated policy to avoid a 2 degree increase in global
temperature. Also cast into doubt must be its support in principle for a second
commitment to Kyoto and its support for current Renewable Energy Targets.
Whilst even the current Government’s
domestic policies, including pricing carbon emissions hardly go far enough, the
coalition’s policies have been found to be 40% less effective.
These facts together with the intention to ‘review” Australia’s Renewable
Energy Targets next year and recent statements by Tony Abbot that direct action
funding is capped, and not to be increased, highlights the coalition’s stated
policy to reduce carbon emissions totally lacks conviction.
John Pettigrew.

No comments:
Post a Comment