Can it continue to pursue the kind of diligent science that
is in the public interest and furthers the public good? Or will that be
sacrificed as the organisation swings its research to focus on science that
offers more lucrative outcomes?
These are vital issues because the swingeing cost cuts
proposed at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organisation, which will
lead to the loss of about 350 jobs at the CSIRO, including as many as 100 roles
in the area of climate science, may prove irreversible
Read today’s Editorial in the Melbourne Age - “Science cannot afford cuts to the CSIRO.”
No comments:
Post a Comment