Letters in today’s Melbourne Age.
We need to redesign
our electricity systems
South Australia, which has substantial wind power, recently
experienced a crisis in electricity supply, requiring a gas-fired power station
to be reopened. Thomas Hogg (Letters, 22/7) uses this example to suggest that
rhetoric about renewable energy does not match reality. The reality is that we
must stop using fossil fuels urgently. We have no choice – unless we want to
bequeath future generations a much hotter world.
Certainly this transformation is difficult. Our electricity
systems are designed around large, centralised, coal and gas-fired power
stations sending electricity radially to consumers. Renewable energy is diffuse
and site-dependent and typically the electricity output is variable.
We could embrace nuclear power and bequeath nuclear waste
and the risk of devastating accidents to future generations. Or we can embrace
renewables and redesign our electricity systems accordingly. This means a
stronger grid, including more interconnections between states, distributed
storage facilities, and more use of solar thermal (which can better match
demand). It also means managing electricity demand to better match the output
of renewable power stations. Rather than dismissing renewables, let us redesign
our electricity systems to make them work with renewables.
Andrea Bunting,
Brunswick.
The flexibility of
pumped hydro-electricity
Thomas Hogg correctly argues that power grids have supply
and demand problems. This balancing act is as old as the grid itself and as
individual as the market in which it operates. All generating assets need to be
shut down for routine maintenance, suffer breakdowns and are strained by
unusual high demand or supply limits (eg coal mine fires, drought, low wind or
sun). The most flexible solution is pumped hydro-electricity as was
incorporated into the Snowy Hydro Scheme in 1949. Pumped hydro responds within
minutes to consume excess electricity to pump water from a low to a high dam.
When there is a supply shortfall, the stored power can be quickly recovered.
Pumped hydro has fast and controlled two-way response at
much lower cost and pollution than batteries. It needs very small water volumes
as they fill and empty daily or weekly (rather than annually like combined
irrigation/power dams), and requires established technology often easily
applied to existing grid systems. Our lives will depend on a renewable future,
including solar and wind. The new multi-sourced grids need to expand pumped
hydro to manage the ever-changing community demand and means of supply.
Robbert Veerman,
Wandin North.
The gradual
transition to renewable energy
In South Australia, when the wind didn't blow and Victoria's
electricity link was down, they did use gas (a fossil fuel) to produce
electricity. But when the wind was blowing, fewer tonnes of carbon dioxide were
put into the atmosphere. Also, because South Australia bought electricity
sourced from gas, less carbon dioxide was emitted than if it had bought it from
coal. Maybe this is an acceptable outcome whilst we are in transition to
renewable energy sources. In terms of emissions saved, it is already certainly
better than coal-based electricity. Let's look at the bigger picture, please.
Jill Dumsday,
Ashburton.
Environment cost of
building turbines
When wind farms are under discussion, a significant factor
is conveniently overlooked – the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of greenhouse
gases which are produced in manufacturing and installing the wind turbines.
Roy Barclay, Frankston
South.


No comments:
Post a Comment