01 January, 2020

How one think tank poisoned Australia’s climate debate.

In the 1980s, long before there was widespread public awareness of the proximity of imminent environmental apocalypse, before climate change became a wedge issue that toppled Australian prime ministers and divided politics, free market think tanks like the Institute of Public Affairs were busy sowing the seeds of doubt.
Gina Rinehart mining hancock prospecting
IPA donor Gina Rinehart.
Today, those seeds have grown into vast tendrils which have a stranglehold on politics. The IPA exists as a conduit between the respectable mainstream right, represented by the Liberal Party, and fringe climate deniers, whose marginal views are largely rejected by the rest of the scientific community. Their greatest success, mirroring that of other free market think tanks in the United States, has been to stitch climate denialism into the very fabric of the conservative political identity.

Read the story from Crikey by Kishor Napier-Raman - “How one think tank poisoned Australia’s climate debate.

No comments:

Post a Comment