Showing posts with label Environment Protection Authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environment Protection Authority. Show all posts

05 May, 2020

Massive Pilbara wind and solar export hub gets environmental green light


Plans for a massive renewable energy generation and export hub based in the Pilbara region of Western Australia have firmed up this week, after being recommended for approval by the state’s Environmental Protection Authority.
Massive Pilbara wind and solar export hub gets environmental green ...
Plans for Pilbara massive renewable energy generation and export hub.
Environmental approval for the 9GW Asian Renewable Energy Hub was recommended on Monday, subject to conditions including consultation on management plans with traditional landowners and managing and monitoring impacts on migratory birds.
The project is one of a handful of truly massive proposed renewable energy investments, along with the 10GW solar plant and huge battery storage project initially backed by billionaires Mike Cannon-Brookes and Andrew Forrest in the Northern Territory. 
There is another 5GW renewable energy project proposed for W.A., and numerous other plans also emerging as developers look to the possibility of renewable hydrogen, either to support the export of green fuels, or even “green metals” – value-added manufacturing underpinned by cheap, green power.
Read the RenewEconomy story by Sophie Vorrath - “Massive Pilbara wind and solar export hub gets environmental green light.”

22 August, 2017

NSW EPA critical of conflicts of interest, complexity of native forestry bill

A draft bill to revamp regulations for native forestry in NSW was slammed as "overly complex" and inequitable, and it failed to address "an inherent conflict of interest" in the oversight of state-owned Forestry Corp.

Logging in state forests may be back in the spotlight. 
Documents obtained by Fairfax Media show the NSW Environment Protection Authority found the government's draft native forestry bill unfairly favoured Forestry Corp by remove licensing requirements for the corporation while maintaining them for landholders or industry seeking private native forestry. 

It would also leave the corporation with powers unmatched for a state agency, including its protection from third-party challenges such as from environmental groups. 

"The inherent conflict of interest for a corporation in having a concurrency role for negotiating, revoking or changing the terms of their licence ... and the removal of third party legal rights, exists nowhere else in NSW legislation or regulation," the EPA's leaked assessment made last December shows.


Read Peter Hannam’s story in The Sydney Morning Herald - “NSW EPA critical of conflicts of interest, complexity of native forestry bill.”

02 May, 2017

State Budget fails to prioritise achievement of climate change and renewable energy targets

Mark Wakeham.
Today’s State Budget delivers significant investment in modernising the Environment Protection Authority and protecting biodiversity, but fails to demonstrate how Victoria will achieve its climate change and renewable energy targets, said Environment Victoria.

Environment Victoria’s CEO Mark Wakeham said today: “The Andrews government has previously announced welcome targets to boost renewable energy and cut the state’s greenhouse pollution by 15-20 percent by 2020. Given this is just three years away we expected to see significant investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency and cutting pollution across the economy in this budget.

“Unfortunately expenditure on climate change and clean energy programs in the budget is dwarfed by over $1 billion funding for new freeways that are likely to increase the state’s greenhouse pollution.

“It’s really disappointing that in a budget with a $1.2 billion surplus we haven’t found adequate funding to match Victoria’s leadership aspirations on climate change and renewable energy.
“This is the third of four budgets that will be delivered by the Andrews government in this term, and none of them have treated climate change as the grave threat that it is to our safety, prosperity and quality of life, despite positive policies and commitments by the Premier between budgets.

“New funding for energy efficiency, renewable energy and energy storage programs is welcome but not at the scale necessary to drive the state’s transition to a renewable energy-powered economy.”

Mr Wakeham said there were more positive results for Victorian’s natural environment with a comprehensive funding package of $162m to modernise the Environment Protection Authority which delivers on the ALP’s pre-election promise.

“The EPA will now have the resources and mandate to protect Victoria’s environment in the 21st century, though it will also need clearer powers to regulate greenhouse pollution.

“We were also pleased with the $86m announced to implement the new biodiversity plan and the two-year boost in funding for extra park rangers in the State’s National Parks.

“The $20m investment in Greener Government Buildings is a welcome rebuilding of a program that was slashed by the previous government.”

Environment Victoria closely examined expenditure from environmental levies including the Sustainability Fund and the Environmental Contribution Levy paid on water bills – an area where successive governments have failed to fully spend levies that are raised for environmental programs.

Mr Wakeham said: “On this score there was real progress in this budget with at least $175m expenditure from the Sustainability Fund, and nearly all the annual contributions from the Environment Contribution Levy being spent this year, though we are concerned that a couple of the programs funded are not primarily concerned with delivering environmental benefits.”
Finally, there was no funding in the budget clearly earmarked for protection of the Leadbeater’s possum habitat and establishment of the Great Forest National Park.

“Creating the Great Forest National Park is an urgent priority for conservation in Victoria, and we’re running out of time to protect a critically endangered species.”

“Overall, there are some strong commitments in the budget for our environment, but we are not yet taking adequate action on climate change which threatens to irreparably damage Victoria’s natural environment, communities and industry.”

Major items of environmental spending in the 2017-18 State Budget:
$86.3m to implement the State’s Biodiversity Plan
$162.5m to strengthen the Environment Protection Authority and Environment Protection Act;
]$25.4m on climate change programs to meet the state’s emissions reductions target;
$88.8m on renewable energy, energy storage and energy efficiency programs;
$30.4m to reduce electronic waste and landfill;
$20m to re-establish the Greener Government Buildings program for energy and water efficiency;
$7.2m for management of coastal and marine environments in the face of climate change impacts;
$9.5m to power Melbourne’s tram network with solar power;
$4.4m to extend the Resource Smart Schools program;
Around $26m to promote sustainable water use, contribute to the Murray Darling Basin Plan, and protect Ramsar wetlands and the Yarra River corridor;
Around $50m for the next wave of sustainable regional water strategies to plan water allocation frameworks and policy across the state.

Environment Victoria’s budget submission is available here.