Showing posts with label Guy McPherson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guy McPherson. Show all posts

24 November, 2015

'Environment not important, try holding your breath while counting your money' - Guy McPherson

G
uy McPherson, a Professor Emeritus of Natural Resources and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona, said:

"If you really think the environment is less important then than the economy, try holding your breath while you count your money".
Guy McPherson.

An author, blogger, and parallel universe version of Bjorn Lomborg, McPherson theorizes that runaway climate change fears near-term human extinction.


McPherson has gained a cultishly persistent following in the deep ecology/"doomer" fringe of the hard green movement. 
His blog is called Nature Bats Last.


04 December, 2014

Controversial view fails scientific tests, but engenders controversy


Climate Code Red by David
Spratt and Philip Sutton.
The idea that climate change could end the human race is provocative, an extremity some endorse and for others a concept that defies scientific realities, extinguishes hope and not helpful in building any mitigation processes.

The article: “Dahr Jamail | Are Humans Going Extinct?” published on truthout refers to and quotes a professor emeritus of natural resources, and ecology and evolutionary biology, with the University of Arizona, who has been studying anthropogenic climate disruption (ACD) for nearly 30 years, Guy McPherson.

The Victorian Climate Action Network group has been alive with thoughts about McPherson’s views when Alastair Leith asked whether or not this “Pretty heavy reading” should be posted to Facebook?

“Will it just encourage the uninitiated to disengage even more on climate change?” he asked.
 
Trent Hawkins ponder similar questions.

Among those who responded was the fellow behind Safe Climate Science, Philip Sutton, who said: “I personally think it doesn't do any good at all to spread this sort of material.  For two reasons: first, because I think it's very unlikely to be correct; and two, because it is massively disempowering.

“I think that the chance that humans (as a species) will be driven extinct by climate change (no matter how bad the climate change is) is just about zero.  “Lots of humans could die (billions) but the rich/powerful/technically savvy will find ways to live in the Polar Regions and along the coastal fringes of the continents and perhaps on the oceans themselves - even in the worst case scenarios.

“But what this sort of material does also is that it chooses to put a zero probability of success on the actions of people who are trying to prevent climate change from causing fully blown catastrophe.  That is not a scientifically valid approach in my view.  It's more like a projection of personal depressive feelings. 
“And spreading one's personal depression to others is not likely to be helpful for effective action,” Philip said.

Fellow co-author of Climate Code Red, David Spratt, said, “This article has serious scientific mistakes, such as: average global temperatures could rise by 6 degrees Celsius by 2050, leading to devastating climate change; and at this level is simply not credible, so why waste time on it?”

David said there is plenty of credible, startling material around for this sort of conversation, such as that by Kevin Anderson, which would be a better focus for conversation.

27 October, 2013

This is just the 'bad news' not the 'really bad news'


Guy McPherson.
Guy McPherson told us just the “bad news” in a presentation just a few days ago at Boulder in Colorado.

He said a little about the “really bad news” and in the Boulder presentation just talked about the “bad news”.

McPherson is a professor emeritus of natural resources and the environment at the University of Arizona.