Showing posts with label scare the horses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scare the horses. Show all posts

31 October, 2015

Yes, it's time to scare the horses!


(Long have I believed that climate change is such a threat to humanity that it makes most everything else in the modern world redundant.

Subsequently, I frequently referred to the dilemma in my weekly (now fortnightly) newspaper column until several weeks ago when my editor said such references were no longer appropriate and I was asked to steer away from the subject.

Climate change, however, has become such a critical and urgent issue that it was something I could no longer directly avoid and so I wrote this column, which will be published in the Shepparton News on Monday, November 2)

-      Robert McLean

I

t’s time to “scare the horses”.

Great, but what does that mean?

A more than a decade of reading about and listening to some of the world’s best minds and understanding the damage you and I, and our fellows are doing and have done to earth’s atmosphere, the constant, although subtle, message has been not to scare the horses.

Okay, but what does that mean?

The facts about climate change, indisputable and illustrated beyond debate by the world’s scientific community, are so contrary to life that to articulate them, as we must if we are to emerge intact from this dilemma, would freeze people into inaction.

Many have warned of that freeze, along with caveat that many “lectured” to about their behaviour, re-double their resistance, become angry,  even more remote from reason and so increasingly determined to adhere to behaviours that are worsening our troubles and align themselves, emotionally and physically, with values contrary to what the world needs.

Circumstances that manifested themselves in two world wars most certainly scared the horses and although the responses were varied, people, although frightened, unsure and uncertain, broadly and generally responded with a commitment that saw sweeping transformations in behaviour preparing communities around the world for the privations, destruction, costs and deaths of war.

Climate change demands an even more disciplined approach, but unlike a war there is no obvious adversary and so while some are scared and confused, a small, but powerful and massively influential minority whose power and influence rest in maintenance of the status quo, continue to laud what exists and encourage more of the same.

As convincing and as populist as their arguments might sound, they are false and beyond that, what is proposed for United Nations climate talks in Paris later this year can be shown as insufficient to put the world on a path to repair.

Preparations for war illustrated the amazing innovative, inventive and can do nature of people and within that their adaptability, which has taken humans to the top of the food chain, as we stood together to confront a common enemy.

Having a clear understanding of who and where the enemy was simplified affairs as it gave people a focus; somewhere and something upon which to vent their frustrations, fears and anger.

Climate change is a more complex, convoluted and wicked problem as the enemy is “us”, making it difficult and confusing, and somewhat impossible, to be angry with yourself and along with that put yourself, your family and friends, and in fact the whole of society of which you are an active part, in the “enemy” category.

So rather than bolt about like scared horses and be angry and irrational, we need to understand and accept we were wrong, we made a mistake and although time is scarce, we need to bond on a war-like footing, make bold decisions, take equally bold actions and make the great escape.

22 April, 2014

Climate change conversation was 'couched', but now openly catastrophic


by Robert McLean.

Personal interest in climate change began more than a decade ago.

Paul Kingsnorth - he said
 too much, too strongly.
A story in the Melbourne Age made oblique warnings about the world getting hotter, discussing carbon dioxide, troubles with the atmosphere and yet making no real predictions about the troubles to come.

World climatologists were, at that time though, certain the world was heading for rather difficult times.

The world of science is, however, one of caution and rarely does anyone announce with an unequivocal surety that certain things are going to happen as that is simply that nature of science – nothing is certain, ever.

Although there was an underlying certainty about the dangers to life on earth, the conversation was always couched in caution as scientists are not prone to making blatant comments not saying anything that might “scare the horses”.

In the latter part of last century, it is fair to say that the science pointing to the potential cataclysmic outcomes of climate change had been proven beyond doubt, but many still had questions about the veracity of the evidence pointing to what is now truly evident.

Doubts were legitimate for that is how science is advanced with scepticism and awkward questions being the engine of its authenticity.

The essence of science has not changed, but has revealed that the authenticity of climate change with some 97 per cent of the world’s qualified scientists agreeing that life on earth is now rather problematic.

In just a decade that conversation has gone from cautious (“don’t scare the horses”) to telling it like it is (catastrophic).

An article in the New York Times headed: “It’s the end of the world as we know it…… and he feels fine” report on Paul Kingsnorth who apologizes for having said too much, and said it too strongly.