Richard Heinberg read “The Limits to Growth” when he was 21
and forty years later he devotes his life to helping the world understand that
what was then a carefully considered promise is now reality.
The American journalist,
author and educator, who has written extensively on energy, economic and
ecological issues, including oil depletion, and serves as the senior fellow at the
Post Carbon Institute, shared his thoughts with Melbournians on Saturday night
(September 22).
![]() |
| Richard Heinberg. |
Heinberg’s views
on dilemmas facing humanity needed to be heard by everyone, especially the “responsible
men”, but sadly only about 100 people were at The Wheeler Centre to hear what
he had to say.
Naturally
Heinberg’s hour-long presentation included many generalizations;
generalizations however, that are founded on fact and confirm the predictions
of the 1972 book, The Limits to Growth.
Heinberg said the
book, for which Donella H. Meadows was the lead author, changed his life.
Meadows was
castigated by the establishment, but time has illustrated that what she and her
fellow authors had concluded was exactly right.
“The data they
had at the time”, Heinberg said, “tended to show a peak a decline in world
industrial output sometime in the first few decade of the 21st
century.”
He said that even
today many who hear about limits to growth claim it was an idea that had be discredited
long ago, but Heinberg said nothing could be further from the truth and as
recently as 2008 the CSRIO considered the question of growth and finite resources
and found we are right on track.
In a joking
manner, Heinberg said; “We’re doing a good job”.
Heinberg explored
three facets of the limits – energy, debt and climate – and on the first,
energy enables everything we do.
“Without energy
nothing happens Many economists will tell you energy represents eight or 10 per
cent of the economy because that is how much of our total budget we spend on
energy, but that doesn’t capture the importance of energy because if you take
away energy then the economy doesn’t just contract by eight or 10 percent, the
economy, in effect, goes away,” he said.
Heinberg discussed
the ever increasing complexities humanity faces because of the terminal decline
of conventional fossil fuels, and the energy they provide along with the added
equally important compounding issues of debt and changes human have caused to
earth’s environment.
Although he was
without direct and precise answers to the difficulties faced by a world
burdened by a burgeoning population, man’s seeming incessant need to consume
and apparent disregard or ignorance of the fact that we, humans, are an
integral part of biosphere, and not separate from it, Heinberg was not hopeful
we could slow the dynamic and arrive at a point that enabled us to live a good
life.
He did not appear
hopeful that his writings, the creation and maintenance of the website, Post Carbon Institute, and educative efforts made through speaking tours such as
that presently taking him around Australia, would ever have much impact in the
face of the forces ranged against him and others of similar belief.
However, he did
see hope through such movements as Transition Towns and similar undertakings
that encouraged localism.
Considering the
future, Heinberg expected those countries presently described as “developed”
would see a noticeably reduction in the quality of their lifestyle, while the
rest of the world would see something contrary to that and the two would meet
somewhere in the middle.

No comments:
Post a Comment