|
A
|
Treasury's effort was little more than a propaganda exercise
about the need to restrain government spending, and showed clear signs of
government interference. It was widely criticised for purporting to tell us
what could happen to the economy over the next 40 years while making no
allowance for the effects of climate change and other environmental problems.
By contrast, CSIRO's peer-reviewed modelling exercise
attempts to look at what may happen to the economy out to 2050, after
accounting for the economic effects of climate change – and our efforts to
reduce it – plus other environmental problems such as energy use, water use and
use of other natural resources.
Read Ross Gittins’ observations in the Melbourne Age today - “Emissions hold key to economic and environmental harmony.”
No comments:
Post a Comment