Climate scientist Professor David Karoly and economist
Professor Clive Hamilton have taken the unprecedented step of publishing a
minority report in response to what they say are major flaws within the CCA
report.
The report accepted as the basis for its recommendations Australia’s
current 2030 emissions reduction target rather than recommending action
consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C.
Professor Karoly said the recommendations of the majority
report were a recipe for further delay in responding to the urgent need to
reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions.
“Even if Australia reduces its emissions by 28 per cent by
2030 as our current targets dictate, more than 90% of Australia’s current
carbon budget will be used up by then,” he said.
“To meet the budget constraint, Australia’s emissions would
have to decline steeply from the current 2030 target and reach net zero by
2035. This is clearly impossible and means that the majority report, by
accepting the government’s targets, lacks credibility.
“Put simply, the actions recommended in the report will not
put Australia on a path to playing its role in limiting global temperature rise
to less than 2°C.”
“The majority report gives the impression that Australia has
plenty of time to implement measures to bring Australia’s emissions sharply
down,” Professor Clive Hamilton said.
“This is untrue and dangerous. Given this, we felt we had no
choice but to write our own report.”
The minority report:
● Argues for the adoption of a carbon budget as the basis of
all of Australia’s climate policies, as recommended by the Climate Change Authority
itself in 2015. (A carbon budget specifies the upper limit of Australia’s total
emissions between now and 2050.)
● Calls for a cap-and-trade emissions trading scheme for electricity
and other sectors withthe option for an emissions-intensity baseline in the
electricity sector.
● Urges consideration of the closure of selected brown-coal
power plants through a bidding process, with closure payments funded by a
mandatory charge on other generators.
● Calls for an increase in the Renewable Energy Target so that
renewables account for 65% of electricity generation in 2030.
● Recommends abolition of the Emissions Reduction Fund,
while supporting the Carbon Farming Initiative.
Professor Karoly said that the majority report fails to meet
the Review’s terms of reference. “It makes recommendations that are not soundly
based on climate science,” he said.
Professor Hamilton said it was disappointing that the
majority report had chosen to frame its recommendations around what is seen to
be politically possible rather than what needs to be done to protect the
nation.
“The evidence suggests that most Australians want stronger
action on climate change, and we hope that policy makers are not spooked by the
fear campaigns of the recent past. Climate change is too big and too
important,” he said.
Read the Minority Report.
No comments:
Post a Comment