Hostage to myopic self-interest: climate science is watered down under political scrutiny

Three decades ago when serious debate on human-induced climate change began globally, a great deal of statesmanship was on display. A preparedness to recognise that this was an issue which transcended nation states, ideologies and political parties. An issue which had to be addressed proactively in the long-term interests of humanity, even if the existential nature of climate risk was far less clear cut than it is today.

‘In the magical thinking of Australian policymakers, a
 pathway of gradual change, constructed over many
decades in a growing, prosperous, coal-fired
world stretches enticingly before us.’ 

Then, as global institutions were put in place to take up this challenge and the extent of change this would impose on the fossil-fuel dominated world became more obvious, the forces of resistance mobilised. Today, despite the diplomatic triumph of the Paris climate agreement, debate around climate change policy has never been more dysfunctional, indeed Orwellian, particularly in Australia.

Read the piece by Ian Dunlop on The Guardian - “Hostage to myopic self-interest: climate science is watered down under political scrutiny.”